Protecting Industrial Devices: The Rising Threat of Insider Attacks
Recent incidents involving communication devices in Lebanon and Syria have highlighted a critical issue that extends far beyond these specific events. The compromise of these devices through supply chain interference demonstrates the vulnerabilities that exist in our increasingly connected world. While many of the details remain undisclosed, it is safe to assume that the attack involved a combination of hardware and software manipulations. The hardware component, whether explosives or a heated battery, likely served as a stationary element, working together with newly inserted code designed for remote activation.
These occurrences serve as a stark reminder that the focus of security concerns should not solely be on traditional external threats, but also on supply chain attacks and insider threats.
The Insider Threat Landscape
In the world of industrial and manufacturing security, much attention has been given to external cyber threats and network protections. However, malicious code can be introduced by insiders and suppliers, compromising the core functionality of critical devices, much like what we know about the recent events in Lebanon and Syria.
The danger lies in the fact that these vulnerabilities are introduced by “trusted” entities within the supply chain. Their actions don’t trigger the same alarms that an external intrusion might, making it difficult for traditional security measures, such as privileged access management (PAM), or intrusion detection systems (IDS), to detect malicious behavior. This is particularly true when nation-state actors are involved, as they often have the resources and motivation to compromise devices at various points in the supply chain, making these security measures obsolete.
The Dormant Threat
Some supply chain attacks can remain undetected for extended periods. For example, malicious code introduced through the supply chain can lie dormant until a specific trigger date, evading conventional cybersecurity approaches, such as PAM, IDS, and other network protections. Malicious code can be persistent. Once activated, network protection, device restarts, and other typical countermeasures often prove ineffective, making the threat particularly challenging to neutralize let alone detect in time.
Dormant threats can have catastrophic consequences across entire supply chains. In manufacturing or critical infrastructure, they can cause production shutdowns, environmental incidents, or even endanger workers’ lives. The impact extends beyond immediate operational disruptions, potentially compromising the integrity of products themselves, as evidenced by recent events in Lebanon and Syria. Additionally, these attacks may render devices completely inoperable or “bricked,” leading to prolonged downtime and significant financial losses.
Strengthening Defenses
In light of the insider threats and dormant vulnerabilities, strengthening defenses against supply chain attacks requires a comprehensive, multi-layered approach. Device-level protection forms a critical foundation in this strategy. By implementing security measures directly to devices, organizations can prevent unauthorized actions and modifications, including the introduction of malicious code by insiders or suppliers. This granular control restricts actions at the device level to only those explicitly authorized, effectively limiting the potential for dormant threats to be introduced or activated.
Building on this foundation, a zero-trust policy becomes essential. Given that these attacks often originate from “trusted” entities within the supply chain, continuous verification of identity and authorization is crucial. This approach, combined with visibility into the factory floors’ ongoing operations (i.e., real time auditing and session management), can help detect anomalies that might indicate the presence of dormant malicious code or unauthorized actions by insiders.
A layered strategy significantly enhances resilience. By implementing security measures from individual devices up to network-level protections, organizations can create a more robust defense against evolving supply chain threats. This comprehensive approach not only strengthens overall security but also provides the capability to contain and mitigate potential damages, addressing the catastrophic consequences these attacks can have on manufacturing processes, worker safety, and product integrity.
—
In light of these recent events, NanoLock Security’s CEO and co-founder, Eran Fine, emphasized in a Bloomberg interview the prevalence of hidden cyber threats within communication and critical infrastructure devices. His comments underscore the urgent need for robust supply chain security measures in our increasingly connected industrial landscape. As these incidents demonstrate, protecting industrial critical infrastructure has never been more crucial. Read the article here.
